 |
O Rings
Backups |
 |
We can manufacture any
o-ring up to 2 meters in diameter fast including NBR, HNBR, Silicone, EPDM, Viton®, Aflas,
Teflon® and polyurethane. |
|
|
Standard
O Rings |
|
|
Fabric Reinforced Vee Packings are recommended for liquid and gas service on
all heavy-duty equipment where operating pressures and clearances exceed the
recommended pressures for the homogeneous packings. They are used in
hydraulic cylinder and pump applications and are available in a number of
compositions covering an exceptionally wide range of operating conditions.
Fabric Reinforced Vee Packings are usually constructed of cotton duck or
asbestos cloth, coated with various elastomers and molded under heat and
pressure. click here for more details |
|
Metric O-ring |
|
|
American standard
size
o-ring (Inch Sizes) |
|
|
O-RINGS & BACK-UPS |
|
|
O-ring
cord |
|
|
O-ring
kit and
assortment |
|
|
Encapsulated
o-rings |
|
|
Square
cut ring |
|
|
Four-sided
rings |
|
|
WE HAVE A MOUNTAIN OF O-RINGS!! |
|
Round cross sections |
|
|
Back-ups available
in standard sizes or machined to your specification. |
|
Square cross sections |
|
|
O-RING MATERIAL |
|
|
Back-ups available
in standard sizes or machined to your specification. |
|
|
|
SPECIAL
O-RINGS Manufactured or CNC Lathe |
|
|
HNBR - 90 Durometer |
|
|
Polyurethane - 92 Durometer Teflon®®
- Glass filled Teflon®® - Virgin |
|
|
Silicone - 85 Durometer |
|
|
Viton® - 90 Durometer |
|
|
Water Resistant Polyurethane |
|
|
NBR - 90 Durometer |
|
|
EPDM - 85 Durometer |
| O-Rings |
|
|
| |
|
| Transeals has over 2 million
metric & imperial O-rings in
our inventory. |
Sizing
In a world where virtually
nothing is absolutely
standard, O-rings sizes by
convention are always stated
as Inside Diameter x Cross
Section.
|
Materials |
Nitrile (NBR) 70 |
The most common elastomer
used for industrial grade
O-rings. Compatible with
most mineral based hydraulic
fluids with a working
temperature range from -40°C
to 110°C. |
Nitrile (NBR) 90 |
Harder than Nitrile 70 and
hence suitable for use as a
high pressure O-ring or back
up washer. |
Viton® 75 |
Possessing the broadest
chemical compatibility of
any mainstream elastomer,
its broad working
temperature range of -35°C
to 205°C and excellent
mechanical properties make
this an excellent high
performance compound for use
in hydraulic systems. |
Silicone, EPDM, Neoprene |
..and other specialty
compounds are available in
many sizes or to order. |
|
|
|
|
|
O-Ring Failure Analysis |
COMMON SEAL FAILURES
 |
ABRASION |
Description: The seal or parts of the seal exhibit a flat
surface parallel to the direction or motion.
Loose particles and scrapes may be found on
the seal surface. |
Contributing
Factors: Rough sealing
surfaces. Excessive temperature. Process
environment containing abrasive particles.
Dynamic motion. Poor elastomer surface
finish. |
Suggested
Solutions: Use
recommended gland surface finishes. Consider
internally lubed elastomers. Eliminate
abrasive components. |
 |
COMPRESSION SET |
Description: The seal exhibits
a flat-sided cross-section, the flat sides
correspoding to the mating seal surfaces. |
Contributing
Factors: Excessive
compression. Excessive temperature.
Incompletely cured elastomer. Elastomer with
high compression set. Excessive volume swell
in chemical. |
Suggested
Solutions: Low
compression set elastomer. Proper gland
design for the specific elastomer. Confirm
material compatibility. |
 |
CHEMICAL DEGRADATION |
Description: The seal may exhibit
many signs of degradation including
blisters, cracks, voids or discoloration. In
some cases, the degradation is observable only by
measurement of physical properties. |
Contributing
Factors: Contributing
Factors: Incompatibility with the chemical
and/or thermal environment. |
Suggested
Solutions: Selection of more chemically resistant
elastomer. |
 |
EXPLOSIVE DECOMPRESSION |
Description: The
seal exhibits blisters, pits or pocks on its
surface. Absorption of gas at high pressure
and the subsequent rapid decrease in
pressure. The absorbed gas blisters and
ruptures the elastomer surface as the
pressure is rapidly removed. |
Contributing
Factors: Rapid
pressure changes. Low-modulus/hardness
elastomer. |
Suggested
Solutions: Higher-modulus/hardness elastomer. Slower
decompression (release of pressure). |
 |
EXTRUSION |
Description: The seal develops
ragged edges (generally on the low-pressure
side) which appear tattered. |
Contributing
Factors: Excessive
clearances. Excessive pressure.
Low-modulus/hardness elastomer. Excessive
gland fill. Irregular clearance gaps. Sharp
gland edges. Improper sizing. |
Suggested
Solutions: Decrease clearances.
Higher-modulus/hard-ness elastomer. Proper
gland design. Use of polymer backup rings. |
 |
INSTALLATION DAMAGE |
Description: The seal or parts
of the seal may exhibit small cuts, nicks or
gashes. |
Contributing
Factors: Sharp
edges on glands or components. Improper
sizing of elastomer. Low-modulus/hardness
elastomer. Elastomer surface contamination. |
Suggested
Solutions: Remove
all sharp edges. Proper gland design. Proper
elastomer sizing. Higher-modulus/hardness
elastomer. |
 |
OUTGASSING / EXTRACTION |
Description: This failure is
often very difficult to detect from
examination of the seal. The seal may
exhibit a decrease in cross-sectional size. |
Contributing
Factors: Improper
or improperly cured elastomer. High vacuum
levels. Low hardness/plasticized elastomer. |
Suggested
Solutions: Avoid
plasticized elastomers. Ensure all seals are
properly post-cured to minimize outgassing. |
 |
OVERCOMPRESSION |
Description: The seal exhibits
parallel flat surfaces (corresponding to the
contact areas) and may develop
circumferential splits within the flattened
surfaces. |
Contributing
Factors: Improper
design—failure to account for thermal or
chemical volume changes, or excessive
compression. |
Suggested
Solutions: Gland
design should take into account material
responses to chemical and thermal
environments. |
 |
PLASMA DEGRADATION |
Description: The seal often
exhibits discoloration, as well as powdered
residue on the surface and possible erosion
of elastomer in the exposed areas. |
Contributing
Factors: Chemical
reactivity of the plasma. Ion bombardment
(sputtering). Electron bombardment
(heating). Improper gland design.
Incompatible seal material. |
Suggested
Solutions: Plasma-compatible elastomer and compound.
Minimize exposed area. Examine gland design. |
 |
SPIRAL FAILURE |
Description: The seal exhibits
cuts or marks which spiral around its
circumference. |
Contributing
Factors: Difficult
or tight installation (static). Slow
reciprocating speed. Low-modulus/hardness
elastomer. Irregular O-ring surface finish
(including excessive parting line).
Excessive gland width. Irregular or rough
gland surface finish. Inadequate
lubrication. |
Suggested
Solutions: Correct
installation procedures. Higher-modulus
elastomer. Internally-lubed elastomers.
Proper gland design. Gland surface finish of
8–16 microinch RMS. Possible use of polymer
backup rings. |
 |
THERMAL DEGRADATION |
Description: The seal may
exhibit radial cracks located on the highest
temperature surfaces. In addition, certain
elastomers may exhibit signs of softening—a
shiny surface as a result of excessive
temperatures. |
Contributing
Factors: Elastomer
thermal properties. Excessive temperature
excursions or cycling. |
Suggested
Solutions: Selection of an
elastomer with improved thermal stability.
Evaluation of the possibility of cooling
sealing surfaces. |
O-RING FAILURE ANALYSIS |
Prevention
of seal failures through proper design,
material selection and maintenance certainly
minimizes the risk of failure. Attention to
the condition of replaced seals, as well as
the equipment performance over time, will
result in improved process reliability,
reduced operating costs and a safer work
environment.
O-ring seals
often fail prematurely in applications
because of improper design or compound
selection. This section is designed to
provide the user with examples of common
failure modes. By correctly identifying the
failure mode, changes in the design or seal
material can lead to improved seal
performance.
From the
end-user’s point of view, a seal can fail in
three (3) general ways:
- Leaking
- Contamination
- Change in Appearance
These three
effects are demonstrated as Ishikawa
(fishbone) diagrams with special emphasis on
the following three analysis areas.
 |
ENVIRONMENT
ANALYSIS |
One
major factor in possible seal
failure is the extreme and harsh
environment in which seals are
expected to perform. The sealing
environment can consist of virtually
anything from inert gases at room
temperatures to aggressive chemicals
at very high temperatures. The
sealing environment may result in
chemical degradation or swelling of
the sealing components. Elevated
temperatures may cause seal
degradation, swelling or outgassing.
And the pressure—or more often, the
vacuum environments—can cause
outgassing and weight loss.
Contributing factors to seal failure
in the sealing environment include:
- Chemical— the type of
chemical(s) in service
- Thermal— the operating
ranges of the seal (also any
thermal cycling)
- Pressure/Vacuum— the
range of pressures or vacuum
levels in the process
|
SEAL DESIGN
ANALYSIS |
Analysis
of the seal application is crucial
to the understanding of possible
failure. Most seal design is
performed by component suppliers and
equipment manufacturers. The designs
are refined as experience is gained.
As quickly as process technology
changes, however, the experience
gained with seal design may not be
relevant to the latest process
technology. Vacuum applications have
historically relied on high levels
of compression and gland fill to
reduce permeation and trapped gases.
These techniques, when applied to
new materials, or at higher
operating temperatures, can result
in premature seal failure.
The
seal design and application can
provide information about the cause
of failure:
- Static Seals— axial and
radial, confined or unconfined
- Dynamic Seals— axial
(open-close) or radial
(reciprocating or rotary)
Standard O Rings |
| Fabric Reinforced Vee Packings are recommended for liquid and gas service on all heavy-duty equipment where operating pressures and clearances exceed the recommended pressures for the homogeneous packings. They are used in hydraulic cylinder and pump applications and are available in a number of compositions covering an exceptionally wide range of operating conditions. Fabric Reinforced Vee Packings are usually constructed of cotton duck or asbestos cloth, coated with various elastomers and molded under heat and pressure. |
| |
Standard O-Ring Sizing Chart

Back to the O-Ring Page
AS568A-
Dash # |
Actual
I.D.
Inches |
Actual
C.S.
Inches |
Actual
I.D.
Millimeters |
Actual
C.S.
Millimeters |
Nominal
Reference
I.D. |
Nominal
Reference
C.S. |
Nominal
Reference
O.D. |
-001
-002
-003
-004
-005
-006
-007
-008
-009
-010
-011
-012
-013
-014
-015
-016
-017
-018
-019
-020
-021
-022
-023
-024
-025
-026
-027
-028
-029
-030
-031
-032
-033
-034
-035
-036
-037
-038
-039
-040
-041
-042
-043
-044
-045
-046
-047
-048
-049
-050 |
.029±.004
.042±.004
.056±.004
.070±.005
.101±.005
.114±.005
.145±.005
.176±.005
.208±.005
.239±.005
.301±.005
.364±.005
.426±.005
.489±.005
.551±.007
.614±.009
.676±.009
.739±.009
.801±.009
.864±.009
.926±.009
.989±.010
1.051±.010
1.114±.010
1.176±.011
1.239±.011
1.301±.011
1.364±.013
1.489±.013
1.614±.013
1.739±.015
1.864±.015
1.989±.018
2.114±.018
2.239±.018
2.364±.018
2.489±.018
2.614±.020
2.739±.020
2.864±.020
2.989±.024
3.239±.024
3.489±.024
3.739±.027
3.989±.027
4.239±.030
4.489±.030
4.739±.030
4.989±.037
5.239±.037 |
.040±.003
.050±.003
.060±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003
.070±.003 |
0.74±0.10
1.07±0.10
1.42±0.10
1.78±0.13
2.57±0.13
2.90±0.13
3.68±0.13
4.47±0.13
5.28±0.13
6.07±0.13
7.65±0.13
9.25±0.13
10.82±0.13
12.42±0.13
14.00±0.18
15.60±0.23
17.17±0.23
18.77±0.23
20.35±0.23
21.95±0.23
23.52±0.23
25.12±0.25
26.70±0.25
28.30±0.25
29.87±0.28
31.47±0.28
33.05±0.28
34.65±0.33
37.82±0.33
41.00±0.33
44.17±0.38
47.35±0.38
50.52±0.46
53.70±0.46
56.87±0.46
60.05±0.46
63.22±0.46
66.40±0.51
69.57±0.51
72.75±0.51
75.92±0.61
82.27±0.61
88.62±0.61
94.97±0.69
101.32±0.69
107.67±0.76
114.02±0.76
120.37±0.76
126.72±0.94
133.07±0.94 |
1.02±0.08
1.27±0.08
1.52±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08
1.78±0.08 |
1/32
3/64
1/16
5/64
3/32
1/8
5/32
3/16
7/32
1/4
5/16
3/8
7/16
1/2
9/16
5/8
11/16
3/4
13/16
7/8
15/16
1
1-1/16
1-1/8
1-3/16
1-1/4
1-5/16
1-3/8
1-1/2
1-5/8
1-3/4
1-7/8
2
2-1/8
2-1/4
2-3/8
2-1/2
2-5/8
2-3/4
2-7/8
3
3-1/4
3-1/2
3-3/4
4
4-1/4
4-1/2
4-3/4
5
5-1/4 |
1/32
3/64
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16 |
3/32
9/64
3/16
13/64
7/32
1/4
9/32
5/16
11/32
3/8
7/16
1/2
9/16
5/8
11/16
3/4
13/16
7/8
15/16
1
1-1/16 | | | | | | | | | | | | |